{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/18b60baca00d46b3b914004fb24f2252\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1918\" height=\"1438\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1438,"width":1918,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1438,"thumbnail_width":1918,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/18b60baca00d46b3b914004fb24f2252-a7b0a10373aca72f.gif","duration":232.871,"title":"Responding to Office Actions","description":"This Loom explains how to use a new search to respond to office actions in an application. It describes choosing between copying and pasting a challenged claim if the application is not published, or dropping in the application number or patent number if it is published. It then instructs adding any additional cited art by manually copying and pasting the examiner cited references under known prior art, which should appear in the Save tab. Finally, it suggests using relevance analysis to compare similarities and differences or asking Clerk specific questions based on the cited art."}