{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/2f2533437c3d4032bd993d03cbc8f091\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1086\" height=\"814\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":814,"width":1086,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":814,"thumbnail_width":1086,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/2f2533437c3d4032bd993d03cbc8f091-00001.jpg","duration":202,"title":"SAT Jan 2018_S1_Q16/Q17","description":"p:  Based on the passage, to which of the following hypothetical situations would Malhotra most strongly object? , and  Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question? \na:  A research team refuses to publish null results in anything less than a top journal. ;\n A research team excludes the portion of data that produced null results when reporting its results in a journal. ;\n A research team unknowingly repeats a study that produced null results for another research team. ;\n A research team performs a follow-up study that expands the scope of an initial study that produced null results.  ;  Lines 36-37 (“Said . . . effects”) ;\n Lines 45-48 (“Overall . . . null results”) ;\n Lines 62-68 (“Even . . . investigator”) ;\n Lines 69-73 (“A registry . . . analyzed”) ;"}