{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/374978de6423472492c0baeefc66965c\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1038\" height=\"778\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":778,"width":1038,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":778,"thumbnail_width":1038,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/374978de6423472492c0baeefc66965c-00001.jpg","duration":134,"title":"S1 Q52 SAT #3","description":"p:  Do the data in the table provide support for the authors’ claim that infection with varroa mites increases a honeybee’s susceptibility to secondary infections? \na:  Yes, because the data provide evidence that infection with a pathogen caused the colonies to undergo colony collapse disorder. ;\n Yes, because for each pathogen, the percent of colonies infected is greater for colonies with colony collapse disorder than for colonies without colony collapse disorder. ;\n No, because the data do not provide evidence about bacteria as a cause of colony collapse disorder. ;\n No, because the data do not indicate whether the honeybees had been infected with mites.  ;"}