{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/3c1e8bc4c97e4655bbb792c3727395b4\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1200\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1200,"width":1600,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1200,"thumbnail_width":1600,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/3c1e8bc4c97e4655bbb792c3727395b4-eaabd3048477dfaa-full.jpg","duration":5317.63,"title":"Unraveling the Fager Family Tragedy","description":"In this video, I delve into my theory about Dennis Rader's involvement in the 1987 triple homicide of the Fager family. I believe Rader stalked and murdered Philip Fager and his two children. I also discuss the psychological implications of Rader's actions and the overlooked clues he sent to the victim's family. I also highlight the 11 correlations that tie him to these crimes. The infamous crossword was also solved during the making of this presentation showing chilling clues left that correlate with the Fager family triple murder.  I encourage you to consider the evidence and share your thoughts on this theory!                                                                                                                                                                       \n                                                                                                                                                                                         TEST OF RELEVANCE AND PROBATIVE VALUE\u0002                                                                                                               \n  1. RELEVANCE OF EVIDENCE TEST-\n○ The crossword puzzle provides compelling evidence of Dennis's\nactive participation in this crime, as he included specific codes that\nalign with his methods from previously admitted offenses, all of\nwhich he detailed.\n○\n■ Identity of the murderer: Does the puzzle point directly to the\ndefendant as the one who killed the victims? YES\n■ Motive: Does it show some sort of psychological pattern or link to\nthe motives of previous killings, suggesting the defendant’s\ninvolvement? YES\n■ Connection between the crimes: Does the puzzle help prove that\nthe crimes were committed by the same person, especially if there\nare similar signatures or methods used? YES\n 2. PROBATIVE VALUE TEST-\n○ Directness of the Link:\n■ The puzzle establishes a clear link between the defendant and\nthe crime scene, as it includes all the victims' names, the family’s\nlast name, and a motive tied to the \"remodel\" of the Fager house,\nwhich is known to have undergone renovations. This connection\nsignificantly enhances the probative value of the evidence. The\nmore directly the evidence ties the defendant to the crime, the\nstronger it becomes. Furthermore, the analysis of Rader's\ncommunications with Mary Fager supports this, revealing that he\ndenied involvement while simultaneously embedding clues in his\ndrawings and poems that indicated he had been in the home.\n○ Consistency with Other Evidence:\n■ This puzzle aligns with a larger pattern of behavior, the\nevidence from prior crimes and communication that\nsignificantly enhances the puzzle’s relevance. When both\npsychological and criminal profiles indicate that this behavior\ncorresponds with the defendant's past actions, the puzzle's\nprobative value becomes substantial.\n○ Expert Testimony:\n■ My 20 page analysis supports this and finds 11 known BTK\ncorrelations from previous admitted crimes and will also be\nsupported by many experts currently reviewing what has been\ndeveloped.\n■ There is a clear direct connection to the current crime so the\npuzzle is relevant probative evidence.\n● The totality of the evidence is crucial here. While the puzzle represents just\none piece of the broader picture linking the defendant to the crime—alongside\nphysical evidence, eyewitness accounts, and forensic findings—it can play a\npivotal role in achieving a conviction"}