{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/4b5285a3e1ed49f48a4c144e216ad06d\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1280\" height=\"960\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":960,"width":1280,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":960,"thumbnail_width":1280,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/4b5285a3e1ed49f48a4c144e216ad06d-00001.gif","duration":438.907,"title":"SmackDown Comparison: Case Text vs ChatGPT 🥊","description":"Hi there, it's Carolyn Elephant of MyShingle. In this video, I compare the artificial intelligence legal research capabilities of Case Text and ChatGPT. Case Text, recently acquired by Thomson Reuters for $650 million, is the more robust tool, providing detailed answers and relevant case law. I tested both platforms by asking about liability for unauthorized tree removal in New Jersey. Case Text delivered comprehensive results, including damages, penalties, and relevant cases. ChatGPT, although faster, provided a broader overview with less depth. It couldn't cite specific cases but referred me to other resources. Overall, Case Text is the better tool for legal research, while ChatGPT serves as a starting point for future research. Watch the video to see the detailed comparison and my experience with both platforms."}