{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/4fb9da0f082d439cb8e21edf1b0c7362\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1440\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1440,"width":1920,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1440,"thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/4fb9da0f082d439cb8e21edf1b0c7362-fbc6f84757d41d76.gif","duration":166.8,"title":"SAT Tutoring","description":"This Loom explains how Ivy Tutors decides between three tutoring options based on data. It compares Classic 101 Tutoring with one-on-one customized curriculum and schedule flexibility, Boost group-style classes with private mentoring, class reporting, and personalized homework, and a combined “best of both worlds” approach. Ivy Tutors says it uses two assessments, including a full-time practice session on its platform and a cognitive assessment built by the University of Pennsylvania’s Syncology Lab, to estimate realistic score improvement and manage expectations. It emphasizes that without this data, companies risk wasting 3 to 4 months before correcting the plan, and it provides example timelines of about 3 months for one-on-one and 1 to 2 months for lighter needs."}