{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/5e9bd010016c43f295b1af7491b75695\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1316\" height=\"987\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":987,"width":1316,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":987,"thumbnail_width":1316,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/5e9bd010016c43f295b1af7491b75695-16fdac88b66b2bbf.gif","duration":264.256,"title":"Traditional Post-Secondary Advising Metrics Won't Cut it Anymore ","description":"I want to go beyond the usual questions like admission selectivity, graduation rate, and net price, because none of those metrics directly show strong career launch. I propose an honest dashboard with three measures. First, success or mobility rate, using Opportunity Insights to see how many students from the bottom fifth reach the top fifth. Second, median earnings in early adulthood, drawing on Georgetown CEW. Third, tenure ROI, using Georgetown CEW cumulative earnings minus total out-of-pocket costs at 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 years. I share how two schools can look similar traditionally but differ sharply in outcomes, and you can use this side by side to evaluate options."}