{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/7fe0db1bb5334394bd29c2f802eba762\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1658\" height=\"1243\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1243,"width":1658,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1243,"thumbnail_width":1658,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/7fe0db1bb5334394bd29c2f802eba762-8f54710bb272e196.gif","duration":189.674666,"title":"Agentic Procurement With Paywalled Compliance Checks","description":"This Loom demonstrates agentic procurement logic for deciding whether a supplier needs a paywalled sanctions and compliance check before placing a bulk order. It describes a live web search where Taveli’s results are used to judge if free information is enough or if a paid check is justified, then it extracts the company name and explains the decision in its own words. The video shows a real USDC payment made via Circle-controlled ballots on Ethereum Sepolia testnet for USB-C cables, including the transaction reference and on-chain verifiable hash. It emphasizes that the endpoint verifies the payment’s on-chain state, destination, and amount before releasing any data, and that replay of a used reference is blocked."}