{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/b3db6b9bfcf74405a52b1b88efe8aa20\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1280\" height=\"960\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":960,"width":1280,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":960,"thumbnail_width":1280,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/b3db6b9bfcf74405a52b1b88efe8aa20-00001.jpg","duration":212,"title":"S1 Q35 &amp; Q36 May 2021","description":"p: It can reasonably be inferred from the passage that Mandel and Johnson strengthened their \nconclusions by\na: A) anticipating a potential criticism of their experimental design.;\nB) recruiting subjects from a variety of economic backgrounds.;\nC) incorporating the input of business students in the interpretation of the results.;\nD) demonstrating the results' applicability outside the context of online marketing.\n\n\n\np: Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?\na: A) Lines 17-21 (“The new ... seen”);\nB) Lines 31-33 (“It's ... said”);\nC) Lines 50-53 (“That ... sofa”);\nD) Lines 58-63 (“To make ... clouds”)"}