{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/d5dcdbbd0b8748c5a7ef0ab550b26a2b\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1440\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1440,"width":1920,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1440,"thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/d5dcdbbd0b8748c5a7ef0ab550b26a2b-2a9ee607d77eb553.gif","duration":251.27,"title":"Using SugarWOD? PRzilla has %, real training max, and full workout logger","description":"This Loom compares SugarWord’s workout tracking with PRZL for more accurate percentage-based weight training. The author says SugarWord’s 80 percent squat and 75 percent press can be wrong because its 1RM history may use a max hit in November 2023, showing 355 even though later they did 275 for 3 in December and were closer to about 315. They demonstrate PRZL’s smart training max, which uses recent lifts, so 80 percent corresponds to 275 for 5 reps. They also show using more than three weight boxes during warmups to log ramp-up sets and then view session load and volume, such as about 3,000 pounds, versus prior sessions."}