{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/eb24162fcc76425cb82867c1cd570a3f\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1436\" height=\"1077\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1077,"width":1436,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1077,"thumbnail_width":1436,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/eb24162fcc76425cb82867c1cd570a3f-7437474e7c9fcb4e.gif","duration":84.402,"title":"Comparing Meeting Recorder Output Accuracy","description":"This Loom compares outputs from different meeting recorders, focusing on how well they assign owners for next steps. The creator reviews Granola, which produces a meeting summary and assigns next steps to the right person, though it contains slight hallucinations. They contrast this with MediLead, which generated a transcript without speaker attribution and could not assign who should receive the action item, even though it identified that the task involves pinging to get sales calls. Stando is also noted to summarize the meeting well but similarly struggles to determine the correct owner."}