{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/f45f8a8a20e241ddb4c33ec13319e2dd\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1670\" height=\"1252\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1252,"width":1670,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1252,"thumbnail_width":1670,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/f45f8a8a20e241ddb4c33ec13319e2dd-b61cbbb0b7bcc64d.gif","duration":1714.361,"title":"Financial Statements &amp; Reporting - Claude Code vs Codex","description":"I did a fun side by side demo comparing OpenAI Codex with GPT 5.5 against the Claude desktop app with Opus 4.7. Using the same demo data and journal entry prep and financial statement skills, both produced nearly matching revenues and cash, but net income differed by about 3k, likely from an owner distributions or expense classification issue. Then I ran another test to generate a one page flash report and a PowerPoint dashboard with brand colors. Claude delivered better looking HTML and clearer key takeaways in the PowerPoint. No viewer action was requested."}