{"type":"video","version":"1.0","html":"<iframe src=\"https://www.loom.com/embed/f76555e470dd449593da7b9057b7a745\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"1728\" height=\"1296\" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>","height":1296,"width":1728,"provider_name":"Loom","provider_url":"https://www.loom.com","thumbnail_height":1296,"thumbnail_width":1728,"thumbnail_url":"https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/f76555e470dd449593da7b9057b7a745-2dea7801daa7ab6f.jpg","duration":1685.0487,"title":"A response to Bisq Easy Mobile discussion #2665","description":"In this video, I respond point-by-point to Henrik's Aug 21st 2024 \"Bisq Easy Mobile\" discussion thread, arguing the case for the \"Thin client model\" option."}