<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/04e8e61b50b14b90a7d08a1d780e3259&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/04e8e61b50b14b90a7d08a1d780e3259-71aa8a6d788141bf.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>1097.304</duration><title>Why String Bed Stiffness Matters for Tennis</title><description>This Loom emphasizes that string bed stiffness and effective stiffness matter more than reference tension when tuning tennis rackets for comfort and performance. The speaker explains effective stiffness as a calculated result of string and racket properties, noting that values approaching 30 indicate a very stiff setup and that they targeted an effective stiffness in the 26 to 27 range for a 95 square inch Dunlop CX200 Tour. They contrast RDC and Flex-4 readings (with examples like 43 vs 60) and argue that without measuring string bed stiffness, a tension number such as “52” or “42” is meaningless. The Loom also promotes their portable StringSense device, aiming for about $100, and mentions a string bed stiffness calculator available on racketquest.tennis.</description></oembed>