<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/0e02b4981d7f404ab08697d306ad5955&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1916&quot; height=&quot;1437&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1437</height><width>1916</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1437</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1916</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/0e02b4981d7f404ab08697d306ad5955-e8675247de184c53.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>644.95</duration><title>Building AI Governance for Financial Advice</title><description>This Loom explains how QuantAI implemented a four-layer AI operating system for the BrightPath financial planning firm to improve efficiency while maintaining regulated governance. BrightPath was rated about 3 out of 10 in AI maturity, and the fix focused on standards, configuration, governance, workflow SOPs, and a shared versioned prompt library, plus AI training and measurement. In the first pilot for advice preparation, drafting time dropped about 34% faster, and for email handling it dropped about 30%, targeting around 20% and reclaiming over a thousand hours per year. A live demo shows the AI can draft and propose meeting times but cannot provide advice or send messages without a human review gate, and it prevents client data from going into AI tools without safeguards.</description></oembed>