video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/118cd56e0af146fdaaad6d1d42c77d86" frameborder="0" width="1728" height="1296" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>12961728Loomhttps://www.loom.com12961728https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/118cd56e0af146fdaaad6d1d42c77d86-0d059106c48f0e83-full.jpg316.822In my capstone, I compare the Port of Singapore and the Port of Long Beach to show how governance, green finance, and regulatory compliance shape who secures capital, sets standards, and builds durable partnerships in USMCA and ASEAN corridors. I use a comparative lens across throughput and capital access, legal architecture, IMO decarbonization, and shore power, plus governance architecture, green finance eligibility, technology governance, alliance architecture, and upstream coordination. Long Beach faces a shift as the federal Port Infrastructure Development Program dropped from $450 million to $75 million in FY26. I created a Corridor Investment Readiness Index and identified $47 billion in foregone institutional capital over a 10 year period.