<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/15cb38a12af647b89312107c833d5468&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1246&quot; height=&quot;934&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>934</height><width>1246</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>934</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1246</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/15cb38a12af647b89312107c833d5468-459a60f1f3cfc27e.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>216.709</duration><title>Using Playbooks to Review Third Party Paper</title><description>This Loom explains how to use lawyer-style playbooks to speed review of third-party contracts by checking non-negotiable terms. The presenter uses an independent contractor agreement with 34 rules and runs a standard review against a document that is not on their paper to highlight priority issues with pass, fail, or fallback outcomes. A yellow icon indicates a rule is met via fallback, such as allowing service descriptions in a referenced exhibit, while a failing rule is shown and corrected, for example changing a specific one-year term to end indefinitely. The approach makes third-party paper review quicker by focusing attention on what matters most.</description></oembed>