video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/206913c937424ab9bb7652893118ed2f" frameborder="0" width="1920" height="1440" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>14401920Loomhttps://www.loom.com14401920https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/206913c937424ab9bb7652893118ed2f-a98f891f354d9e33.gif2685.816In this video, I discuss the complexities of diagnostic testing for Lyme disease, emphasizing that while serology is a common tool, it may not always provide reliable results. I highlight the importance of understanding test sensitivity and specificity, as well as the limitations of current testing methods, particularly in early and late stages of the disease. I also explain the sequential testing approach and the significance of clinical presentation in interpreting results. I encourage viewers to consider these factors when diagnosing Lyme disease and to rely on clinical judgment alongside test results. Please remember that positive serology can support a diagnosis, but negative results should not rule out Lyme disease.