<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/2454cf105d804ddd9632ad83539929b8&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/2454cf105d804ddd9632ad83539929b8-e1d05030f50e8c4a.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>180.283</duration><title>Stream vs. Freed: Understanding Documentation Models in Primary Care 🩺</title><description>In this video, I discuss the key differences between Stream and Freed, two documentation models in primary care. Freed focuses on generating fast visit nodes, creating a stack of documents for each patient visit, while Stream organizes documentation around medical problems, allowing for clearer, longitudinal charts. This means that when I see a patient again, I can simply update their existing problems without rewriting their history. If your priority is speed, Freed excels, but if you value continuity and clarity in patient care, Stream is designed for that purpose. I encourage you to consider how these models align with your clinical needs.</description></oembed>