<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/2660a2779bd54824a976c4c4d83e8b07&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/2660a2779bd54824a976c4c4d83e8b07-24f584b41bd1e09c.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>165.44</duration><title>Correcting angle measurement for Case 2</title><description>Hi guys, it’s me, Authentical Girl, and I wanted to clarify what I fixed for case 2 since I’m not going to be there Tuesday before the lab is due. We had a problem measuring the strength angle with the phone ruler, because keeping the ruler perfectly horizontal gave 0 degrees, and measuring that way gave us about 18 degrees instead of the required angle. The fix was to add 18 plus 90, so the target angle is 108 degrees. I also want someone to confirm the board values I wrote, since I only took my own picture, and I believe it should match a value close to tension equal mass 2 times G with about 3 percent error. Please confirm the board setup and use 57 for data 1 and 108 for data 2.</description></oembed>