<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/2693c767c0c048b8bc5ba8aec3ea1331&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/2693c767c0c048b8bc5ba8aec3ea1331-bab02eccb49366b9.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>287.709</duration><title>Exemption Notice Analysis 📝</title><description>In this video, I dissect an exemption notice from the school district that repeatedly uses the term &quot;existing.&quot; I uncover inconsistencies in the document, highlighting issues with the proposed construction and operations. Viewers are urged to scrutinize the misleading use of terminology and consider the implications of the project&apos;s approval. Action: Vote against the exemption.</description></oembed>