<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/288b3388a3a6437aaf6675533d7aefd4&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1838&quot; height=&quot;1378&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1378</height><width>1838</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1378</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1838</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/288b3388a3a6437aaf6675533d7aefd4-cd45df017c5e662f.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>4392.449</duration><title>9FM0 D1 Set 6 Prims Kruskals &amp;amp; MSTs</title><description>In this video, I walk through a complex problem involving prims, nearest neighbour algorithms, and minimal spanning trees, specifically focusing on a scenario with six ponds and the time it takes to check them. I detail my calculations, revealing that the nearest neighbour from A is two less than the total length from D, leading to the conclusion that x equals 13. I emphasize the importance of understanding how to derive these values and the relationships between them. Additionally, I discuss how to apply this knowledge to find the quickest time to check all six ponds starting and finishing at A. I encourage viewers to follow along with the calculations and ensure they grasp the concepts presented.</description></oembed>