<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/2f2533437c3d4032bd993d03cbc8f091&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1086&quot; height=&quot;814&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>814</height><width>1086</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>814</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1086</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/2f2533437c3d4032bd993d03cbc8f091-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>202</duration><title>SAT Jan 2018_S1_Q16/Q17</title><description>p:  Based on the passage, to which of the following hypothetical situations would Malhotra most strongly object? , and  Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question? 
a:  A research team refuses to publish null results in anything less than a top journal. ;
 A research team excludes the portion of data that produced null results when reporting its results in a journal. ;
 A research team unknowingly repeats a study that produced null results for another research team. ;
 A research team performs a follow-up study that expands the scope of an initial study that produced null results.  ;  Lines 36-37 (“Said . . . effects”) ;
 Lines 45-48 (“Overall . . . null results”) ;
 Lines 62-68 (“Even . . . investigator”) ;
 Lines 69-73 (“A registry . . . analyzed”) ;</description></oembed>