<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/3443f359a20e4538a576b0938f8e33f2&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1512&quot; height=&quot;1134&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1134</height><width>1512</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1134</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1512</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/3443f359a20e4538a576b0938f8e33f2-1719358626747.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>248.639</duration><title>Montana HVI - TOPSIS results by census tract</title><description>Welcome to the final methodology introduction video for the Montana heat vulnerability index project. I discuss visualizing sensitivity testing results through vulnerability score distributions across census tracts, comparing two scenarios: New Jersey Equal Weight Approach and Montana Climate Assessment&apos;s methodology. I explain how vulnerability scores are categorized and visualized through box plots, highlighting differences in methodology impact.</description></oembed>