video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/3c1e8bc4c97e4655bbb792c3727395b4" frameborder="0" width="1600" height="1200" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>12001600Loomhttps://www.loom.com12001600https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/3c1e8bc4c97e4655bbb792c3727395b4-eaabd3048477dfaa-full.jpg5317.63In this video, I delve into my theory about Dennis Rader's involvement in the 1987 triple homicide of the Fager family. I believe Rader stalked and murdered Philip Fager and his two children. I also discuss the psychological implications of Rader's actions and the overlooked clues he sent to the victim's family. I also highlight the 11 correlations that tie him to these crimes. The infamous crossword was also solved during the making of this presentation showing chilling clues left that correlate with the Fager family triple murder. I encourage you to consider the evidence and share your thoughts on this theory! TEST OF RELEVANCE AND PROBATIVE VALUE 1. RELEVANCE OF EVIDENCE TEST- ○ The crossword puzzle provides compelling evidence of Dennis's active participation in this crime, as he included specific codes that align with his methods from previously admitted offenses, all of which he detailed. ○ ■ Identity of the murderer: Does the puzzle point directly to the defendant as the one who killed the victims? YES ■ Motive: Does it show some sort of psychological pattern or link to the motives of previous killings, suggesting the defendant’s involvement? YES ■ Connection between the crimes: Does the puzzle help prove that the crimes were committed by the same person, especially if there are similar signatures or methods used? YES 2. PROBATIVE VALUE TEST- ○ Directness of the Link: ■ The puzzle establishes a clear link between the defendant and the crime scene, as it includes all the victims' names, the family’s last name, and a motive tied to the "remodel" of the Fager house, which is known to have undergone renovations. This connection significantly enhances the probative value of the evidence. The more directly the evidence ties the defendant to the crime, the stronger it becomes. Furthermore, the analysis of Rader's communications with Mary Fager supports this, revealing that he denied involvement while simultaneously embedding clues in his drawings and poems that indicated he had been in the home. ○ Consistency with Other Evidence: ■ This puzzle aligns with a larger pattern of behavior, the evidence from prior crimes and communication that significantly enhances the puzzle’s relevance. When both psychological and criminal profiles indicate that this behavior corresponds with the defendant's past actions, the puzzle's probative value becomes substantial. ○ Expert Testimony: ■ My 20 page analysis supports this and finds 11 known BTK correlations from previous admitted crimes and will also be supported by many experts currently reviewing what has been developed. ■ There is a clear direct connection to the current crime so the puzzle is relevant probative evidence. ● The totality of the evidence is crucial here. While the puzzle represents just one piece of the broader picture linking the defendant to the crime—alongside physical evidence, eyewitness accounts, and forensic findings—it can play a pivotal role in achieving a conviction