<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/447233b70c6d47fc9a2910d37ae63b6b&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/447233b70c6d47fc9a2910d37ae63b6b-abea117ef451a7cd.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>416.662</duration><title>Gen Ed: Aligning Forms and Syllabi</title><description>In the Gen Ed Committee, I want to show you how we review what you will do in the forum and where that plan appears in your syllabus, especially for teaching and assessing SLOs. I used Angela McGowan Kirsch’s syllabus as an example, focusing on how AI is integrated into the information literacy SLOs through structured module activities and assignments like informative and persuasive speeches. She also shows alignment by requiring an AI transparency statement, reflection questions, and clear responsibilities like disclosure, fact checking, and attribution. There was no specific action requested from you in this video.</description></oembed>