video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/4b5285a3e1ed49f48a4c144e216ad06d" frameborder="0" width="1280" height="960" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>9601280Loomhttps://www.loom.com9601280https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/4b5285a3e1ed49f48a4c144e216ad06d-00001.gif438.907Hi there, it's Carolyn Elephant of MyShingle. In this video, I compare the artificial intelligence legal research capabilities of Case Text and ChatGPT. Case Text, recently acquired by Thomson Reuters for $650 million, is the more robust tool, providing detailed answers and relevant case law. I tested both platforms by asking about liability for unauthorized tree removal in New Jersey. Case Text delivered comprehensive results, including damages, penalties, and relevant cases. ChatGPT, although faster, provided a broader overview with less depth. It couldn't cite specific cases but referred me to other resources. Overall, Case Text is the better tool for legal research, while ChatGPT serves as a starting point for future research. Watch the video to see the detailed comparison and my experience with both platforms.