<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/4c4625448e314766b437b87d283dcfef&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/4c4625448e314766b437b87d283dcfef-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>159</duration><title>S1 Q26 May 2021</title><description>p: According to the passage, the earlier studies that Bhullar consulted were important primarily 
because they
a: A) confirmed when beak formation in an embryonic bird typically begins.;
B) identified particular genes that could initiate beak formation in birds.;
C) proved that beak formation in birds was a response to external conditions.;
D) pinpointed the primary gene that activates the development of a bird&apos;s beak.</description></oembed>