video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/4fb9da0f082d439cb8e21edf1b0c7362" frameborder="0" width="1920" height="1440" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>14401920Loomhttps://www.loom.com14401920https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/4fb9da0f082d439cb8e21edf1b0c7362-fbc6f84757d41d76.gif166.8This Loom explains how Ivy Tutors decides between three tutoring options based on data. It compares Classic 101 Tutoring with one-on-one customized curriculum and schedule flexibility, Boost group-style classes with private mentoring, class reporting, and personalized homework, and a combined “best of both worlds” approach. Ivy Tutors says it uses two assessments, including a full-time practice session on its platform and a cognitive assessment built by the University of Pennsylvania’s Syncology Lab, to estimate realistic score improvement and manage expectations. It emphasizes that without this data, companies risk wasting 3 to 4 months before correcting the plan, and it provides example timelines of about 3 months for one-on-one and 1 to 2 months for lighter needs.