<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/4ff3971917c44a1aa2284bc48fd044b4&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1114&quot; height=&quot;835&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>835</height><width>1114</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>835</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1114</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/4ff3971917c44a1aa2284bc48fd044b4-5d18abe394ecc7db.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>300.19</duration><title>Music Recommendation Reliability Layer and Evaluation</title><description>I built on the Module 3 Music Recommendation Simulation with a reliability layer. Every recommendation now includes a confidence score based on high genre match, mode match, and energy similarity, and the CLI prints reasons plus a reliability check. I also run an evaluation harness on predefined user profiles, so we get pass rate and average confidence, like 3 out of 4 passing and an average confidence of 0.94. The harness showed a key failure case where mood and energy can conflict, and the engine favors energy closeness. No viewer action was requested.</description></oembed>