<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/58eafcaa13e646fea036b0ba30942614&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1152&quot; height=&quot;864&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>864</height><width>1152</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>864</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1152</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/58eafcaa13e646fea036b0ba30942614-1593162953053.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>353</duration><title>Dissociating morpheme and syllable effects in lexical access</title><description>In this experiment, we tried to dissociate morphological effects from syllable effects, comparing three different English inflections to monomorphemic controls. Pilot data were collected online with a 150ms visual priming paradigm.</description></oembed>