<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/5a323f307b014c7d9ca747124219c07f&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/5a323f307b014c7d9ca747124219c07f-b729661e2e5f02fd.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>166.13</duration><title>ASSESSMENT: UTILISING SMALL, FREQUENT CHECK-INS </title><description>In this video, I discuss the potential security issues that could arise if there were no restrictions on user mode applications. I encourage you to think about the risks, such as SQL injection, malware downloads, and ransomware, that could occur if an executable file had unrestricted access. I also reflect on my experiences with virtual machines and the impact of resource allocation on host systems. Please consider these security implications as we move forward in our discussions. Your insights on this topic would be greatly appreciated.</description></oembed>