video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/5bcb2f2d21224e2fb9dc9d315bd734e1" frameborder="0" width="1280" height="960" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>9601280Loomhttps://www.loom.com9601280https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/5bcb2f2d21224e2fb9dc9d315bd734e1-6628d785673fbdc0-full.jpg3100.827Today’s session focused on the recent Aetna reimbursement change affecting Alma providers and what it means for private practice clinicians. Key takeaways: Alma/Aetna update: Melissa explained that Aetna’s new reimbursement structure is reducing pay for some Alma providers, with a notable decrease for many master’s-level clinicians. What it may signal: The change was framed as part of a larger shift in insurance toward value-based care and greater use of platform-collected data. Platform pros/cons: Health tech platforms can make insurance easier by handling credentialing, billing, and payments, but they also come with tradeoffs like limited control, privacy concerns, and dependence on platform contracts. Independent contracting: Providers were encouraged to consider whether staying with a platform, contracting independently, or joining a group practice is the best fit. Compliance matters: Melissa emphasized the importance of understanding credentialing, contracting, CAQH/DataSpring, liability insurance, tax IDs, NPIs, and ongoing payer compliance. Resources shared: Mental Health Insurance Reform Task Force Petition links related to the Alma/Aetna issue TherAssist tools and training resources, including startup and billing materials