<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/6e9fda535fbf4310a5f5d0d85f9bd4c4&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;962&quot; height=&quot;721&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>721</height><width>962</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>721</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>962</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/6e9fda535fbf4310a5f5d0d85f9bd4c4-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>122</duration><title>SAT #3_S2_Q33</title><description>p:  The writer wants a conclusion that conveys how the shortcomings of 1-MCP presented in the passage affect the actions of people in the fruit industry. Which choice best accomplishes this goal? 
a:  NO CHANGE ;
 many of the improvements to fruit quality they have discovered so far have required trade-offs in other properties of the fruit. ;
 for now many fruit sellers must weigh the relative values of aroma, color, and freshness when deciding whether to use 1-MCP. ;
 it must be acknowledged that 1-MCP, despite some inadequacies, has enabled the fruit industry to ship and store fruit in ways that were impossible before.  ;</description></oembed>