<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/769fb4a0efe74c60a7b28daf2ca01038&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/769fb4a0efe74c60a7b28daf2ca01038-90d0e0388d4ca60a.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>285.91</duration><title>Lead Tracking and Labeling Strategy Discussion</title><description>Hey Jen, I wanted to share my thoughts on how we can label and track our leads more effectively. I&apos;m thinking of using key indicators to categorize leads into different buckets like DEAD, qualified, and no-answer, which will help us keep track of their status throughout the month. For instance, if a lead is in the DEAD category, we should tag it with the reason, and for those in follow-up or appointment set, they&apos;ll be considered qualified. I believe this approach will simplify our tracking process, but I&apos;m open to any other ideas you might have. Let me know what you think!</description></oembed>