<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/7853483fc7ff485c9ab381189b3c6742&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1896&quot; height=&quot;1422&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1422</height><width>1896</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1422</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1896</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/7853483fc7ff485c9ab381189b3c6742-25ac34a8597b495b.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>583.341</duration><title>Comparing Legacy and New Ion Kitting Experiences: A Speed Analysis</title><description>In this video, I provide a side-by-side comparison of the Legacy Ion Kitting Experience and the new Ion Kitting Experience, focusing on the differences in speed and efficiency for material handlers. I walk through the process of digitally kitting a kit assigned to me, highlighting the steps of filtering inventory, printing barcodes, and preparing for physical kitting. I also note the importance of sorting inventory correctly and how the new experience allows for a more streamlined approach, including carrying an iPad for easier navigation. I encourage viewers to pay attention to the improvements in the new system and consider how these changes can enhance our kitting operations. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification on the process.</description></oembed>