video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/808467dbe7dd45b6ad81552ad10305b0" frameborder="0" width="1154" height="865" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>8651154Loomhttps://www.loom.com8651154https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/808467dbe7dd45b6ad81552ad10305b0-6396f1a95c979c96.gif962.6This Loom reviews Callan’s diagnostic results and provides targeted feedback on areas to improve. Callan performed well overall, getting most attempted questions correct, with minor mistakes including skipped parts 1B and 4, and occasional incomplete or unclear working such as in question 2 and the simultaneous equation in question 3B. Key issues included remembering to convert inequalities, showing calculation steps and appropriate formulas for percentage and exponential growth, and using correct notation like inequality signs and brackets for coordinates. He also lost marks for missing required reasons or terminology in later questions, incomplete answers to prompts, and not fully simplifying probabilities, with an overall score of 67.7 percent.