<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/84368b8f8b7b4a17b3922832dd9005fc&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1304&quot; height=&quot;978&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>978</height><width>1304</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>978</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1304</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/84368b8f8b7b4a17b3922832dd9005fc-00001.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>236.6666666666666</duration><title>Loom: Gas Fees and Slot Reservations</title><description>Hey, I wanted to react to Dimitri&apos;s point about gas fees and slot reservations. While it fixes UX issues, it doesn&apos;t solve the problem of possible attacks. On L2s, contract calls are cheap and there are no costs to do slot reservation calls. So, increasing the reservation per slot to three is just two more calls to make, which is nothing. The point is that in the centralized world, there needs to be a cost to something if we want reasonable behavior. If we don&apos;t have it, then people can do things that we don&apos;t want them to do. So, in this sense, exactly do the slots quoting. It being possible makes it possible for people to do things that we didn&apos;t think of, and then it&apos;s our problem and our mess to fix afterwards.</description></oembed>