<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/853bf8dd692e4cb39e7170b4d11c9f3b&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1728&quot; height=&quot;1296&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1296</height><width>1728</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1296</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1728</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/853bf8dd692e4cb39e7170b4d11c9f3b-78d508dad3dbe8cc.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>268.651</duration><title>Data Analysis and Feature Engineering Insights from TTC SCADA Delay Records</title><description>In this video, I walk through my contributions to the TTCC, focusing on phase two, which involves EDA data analysis, and phase three, feature engineering tasks using the consolidated dataset prepared by Hussain. I analyzed a TTC SCADA delay CSV file containing 12 years of data, revealing key insights such as peak delay hours and significant trends in incident behavior. I also performed feature engineering, creating time-based features and a new target variable, delayBin, which categorizes delays into low, medium, high, and severe. This transformed our predictive problem into a structural classification problem. I encourage viewers to review the EDA charts saved in our project repository and consider the implications of the findings for our modeling phase.</description></oembed>