<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/88f2203c6c544108ade8ad772599b4f7&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/88f2203c6c544108ade8ad772599b4f7-e0f664447b1dd709.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>202.998</duration><title>Investigating Client Re-scores</title><description>In this video, I walk you through the process of researching a client&apos;s request for a re-score, specifically focusing on a recent inquiry from a Hawaiian Bros Territory Director. I discuss the importance of judgment calls in scoring and how different editors might have varying opinions on the same item. I also highlight the need to consult with Matt, who typically makes the final decision on these matters. Please take note of my approach to responding to the client&apos;s email, as I think it’s crucial for our communication.</description></oembed>