video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/8bf6602d46fd4459b04ce8f7f4394ee0" frameborder="0" width="1280" height="960" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>9601280Loomhttps://www.loom.com9601280https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/8bf6602d46fd4459b04ce8f7f4394ee0-fa00cfd371102e69.gif165.367This Loom discusses three approaches companies use to manage website security and the tradeoffs of each. It contrasts open source platforms like WordPress, where responsibility for plugin updates and audits is unclear and multiple third parties must be trusted, with agency-built CMS solutions that may be less battle-hardened and often lack security-focused budgets. It then presents Experial’s approach using Webflow, emphasizing no plugins to update and built-in security supported by a full-time global security team, external audits, and SOC2 and ISO 27001 certifications, plus an added layer (Clubflare) that filters malicious bots. It also offers a free web security guideline and check to assess site security.