video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/90216b22a85e44cdb31e786c1bd28712" frameborder="0" width="2214" height="1660" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>16602214Loomhttps://www.loom.com16602214https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/90216b22a85e44cdb31e786c1bd28712-8e23b68a6007e5e5.gif443.421This Loom explains how compounding drives portfolio growth through repeated reinvestment of property profits. The author emphasizes cash flow over ego by avoiding delays while waiting for a perfect, more undervalued deal, noting that losing two months can let competitors move ahead. They also argue for speed over precision and assess aggregate performance, saying more properties increase credibility and leverage with agents, leading to faster acquisition (for example, the next property took about one month after the first, which took five to six months). In a theoretical scenario in the Sydney market, each property generates about 25k profit per year after saving roughly 10k per property, showing growth from year 1 to 3 properties in year 1, 11 in year 2, and 38 in year 3 with about 5k left in cash, while acknowledging real-world delays and expenses.