<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/966ab39f324149c8986eaa7f07e71c1a&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1728&quot; height=&quot;1296&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1296</height><width>1728</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1296</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1728</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/966ab39f324149c8986eaa7f07e71c1a-6612c767a6708de0.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>331.79</duration><title>Measuring Brand Equity: Key Insights and Strategies</title><description>In this video, I discuss the importance of measuring brand equity and the common pitfalls in brand tracking studies, particularly when focusing solely on non-customer audiences. I emphasize the need to analyze customer satisfaction and profitability to identify areas for improvement, especially among vulnerable customer segments that show high profitability but low satisfaction. For instance, in a hypothetical SaaS study, our client’s core customers had a 78% satisfaction rate, while vulnerable customers were at only 55%, highlighting a significant issue. I also illustrate how brand credibility impacted customer commitment in this case, showing that a one-point gain in credibility led to a 0.65 point increase in commitment. I encourage you to consider these insights as you refine your customer strategy moving forward.

You can read the full insights post on this case here: https://www.conclusivegroup.com/insights/2025-07-09-when-brand-equity-trackers-neglect-customers/</description></oembed>