<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/9818352e89794c4b864f2574c43d0c52&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/9818352e89794c4b864f2574c43d0c52-8f3f1f17f503f738.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>390.8911</duration><title>Triggered emails that look good but aren&apos;t good</title><description>In this video, I discuss a triggered email I received from British Gas following a problematic experience with our meters, which resulted in us being cut off despite having a significant credit balance. I highlight the importance of understanding customer context when sending automated communications, as this email arrived during an ongoing complaint and was poorly timed. While the email&apos;s design and content were strong, it failed to consider our situation, which could have been addressed by implementing exclusion guardrails in their marketing strategy. I encourage marketers to collaborate with service teams to capture the reasons behind customer issues to improve communication effectiveness. No specific action was requested from viewers, but I hope to raise awareness about these marketing practices.</description></oembed>