<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/9b8d1eb64dea4132a8549f59ff95173c&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1580&quot; height=&quot;1185&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1185</height><width>1580</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1185</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1580</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/9b8d1eb64dea4132a8549f59ff95173c-354822a0de632e2d.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>77.15</duration><title>Using Precedent to Resolve Compliance Gaps</title><description>This Loom introduces a new “precedent” feature on the contract details page to help reviewers understand similar commitments found by the program analysis. After running the analysis, the agent now shows whether the customer has previously committed to related timelines, such as accepting a 5-day or 30-day remediation plan. The example contrasts having no precedent for a 15-day post-approval fix with having full precedent for another gap. This context helps decide whether to prioritize redlining among other commitments or adapt the program to be compliant.</description></oembed>