<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/a4e426ec931b4dcbb54f86061236d32f&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/a4e426ec931b4dcbb54f86061236d32f-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>192</duration><title>S2 Q43 March 2018</title><description>p: Which information from the table provides the strongest evidence in support of the passage&apos;s main idea?
a: IUCN lists a total of 642 at-risk species;
ESA fails to recognize 82.7 percent of the species listed as at-risk by the IUCN;
ESA fails to recognize 80.0 percent of the amphibian species listed by the IUCN as at-risk;
IUCN includes six classes of animals in its classification of at-risk animal populations</description></oembed>