<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/a90bed5b12434de3a098f3594e83e9bb&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/a90bed5b12434de3a098f3594e83e9bb-6036a80e9a55bb56.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>300.139</duration><title>Building a RAG Q and A System</title><description>This Loom explains a prototype for building a document Q&amp;A RAG system for the reclaim process, using public APIs and Superbase to store and retrieve content. The author describes running a local backend and front end, ingesting documents into a vector store, and exposing the knowledge base via an MCP server tool, with citation-backed responses. They demonstrate a simple evaluation pipeline using FAFSA-related information and report position five out of twelve test question results with an overall precision of about 83% for 33%. They discuss next steps focused on improving reliability and measurable quality, including hybrid retrieval and re-ranking, benchmarking, and adding guardrails and better observability.</description></oembed>