<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/b39a3c14fbb54badabfff709327ce8f8&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/b39a3c14fbb54badabfff709327ce8f8-8686550cdd79a510.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>203</duration><title>Kacey</title><description>This Loom explains how recruiters distribute projects and how the team sources candidates based on the type of recruiting request. It distinguishes head hunting, where there is no starting list and the recruiter provides parameters like radius, qualifications, and sometimes license checks, versus email lists, where names are already provided via tools like ZocDock and the team scripts through pages until completion or the stated due date. It also covers a “found” approach, where platforms like Indeed or LinkedIn may already include initial messages and the team then looks for emails if there is no response. Prioritization depends on which recruiter tagged the most urgent position first.</description></oembed>