<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/b3db6b9bfcf74405a52b1b88efe8aa20&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1280&quot; height=&quot;960&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>960</height><width>1280</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>960</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/b3db6b9bfcf74405a52b1b88efe8aa20-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>212</duration><title>S1 Q35 &amp;amp; Q36 May 2021</title><description>p: It can reasonably be inferred from the passage that Mandel and Johnson strengthened their 
conclusions by
a: A) anticipating a potential criticism of their experimental design.;
B) recruiting subjects from a variety of economic backgrounds.;
C) incorporating the input of business students in the interpretation of the results.;
D) demonstrating the results&apos; applicability outside the context of online marketing.



p: Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question?
a: A) Lines 17-21 (“The new ... seen”);
B) Lines 31-33 (“It&apos;s ... said”);
C) Lines 50-53 (“That ... sofa”);
D) Lines 58-63 (“To make ... clouds”)</description></oembed>