<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/bc1174cc0e234834915b84e70f634ea1&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/bc1174cc0e234834915b84e70f634ea1-8379ba0851545619.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>142.14</duration><title>Understanding Limited Orthodontic Cases 👩‍⚕️</title><description>In this video, I discuss a case involving a patient who initially came in for a TMJ consult but later expressed dissatisfaction with the spacing in her front teeth, known as black triangles. I explain the need for interproximal reduction (IPR) to address the issue and outline a conservative treatment plan involving nightguards and Vibera with bite ramps. No Invisalign was considered due to the patient&apos;s good occlusion. The focus is on minimal intervention and addressing specific concerns to achieve optimal results.</description></oembed>